A woodland contract can look profitable on the map, then lose its margin at the first soft rack, unstable landing or rejected timber load. Knowing how to tender woodland contracts is not about producing the lowest figure. It is about putting a price on the work you can actually deliver safely, legally and to the client’s specification.
For harvesting contractors, how to tender woodland contracts accurately is where production assumptions, machine costs, timber recovery, haulage access and environmental restrictions all meet. Get the groundwork right and the bid gives you a fair chance of earning. Miss a condition in the specification and you may have bought yourself a difficult job.
-
That’s a remarkable amount of work hours for a single machine, the Norcar 600 owned by Erkki Rinne is taken well care of, it even has the original Diesel engine.
-
Kieran Anders is a forestry contractor working in the lake district. His work involves hand cutting and extracting timber using a skidder and tractor-trailer forwarder.
-
It is not possible to eliminate chain shot, but there are simple steps that can be taken to reduce the risk.
-
Arwel takes great pride in the fact that the mill has no waste whatsoever, “the peelings are used for children’s playgrounds, gardens and for farm animals in barns in the winter and the sawdust has multiple uses in gardens and farms as well.
-
Timber hauliers need to encourage young blood in, and also look after the hauliers we have, we need make the sector a safe and positive place to work.
FIND US ON
Start with the contract, not the rate
Before working out a day rate or a price per tonne, establish exactly what is being bought. A client may be tendering for clearfell, thinning, roadside processing, extraction only, coppice work, windblow clearance, access construction or a combination of these. The difference matters. A thinning block with retained stems, tight extraction routes and a conservation constraint cannot be priced like a straightforward conifer clearfell.
Read every page of the invitation to tender, including appendices, maps and site rules. Clarify whether the contract is paid by standing volume, delivered tonnes, hectares, a fixed sum, scheduled rates or measured outputs. Also identify who carries the risk for variations in volume, timber quality and product mix.
At this stage, pull out the non-negotiables. These commonly include:
- required start and completion dates;
- harvesting and extraction methods permitted on site;
- environmental conditions, such as nesting periods, buffer zones and ground protection;
- insurance, accreditations and operator competency requirements;
- haulage arrangements, timber measurement and weighbridge procedure; and
- reinstatement, brash management, road maintenance and handover standards.
Do not assume an item is someone else’s responsibility because it is not mentioned in the main work description. If the tender documents are unclear, submit questions before the deadline. A written answer is worth far more than an assumption made in the cab.
Survey the woodland before you tender
No serious woodland tender should be built from aerial imagery and a compartment schedule alone. Walk the site. Take the person who will plan the operation if possible, whether that is the harvester operator, forester, extraction contractor or working supervisor. They will often spot the practical pinch points quicker than anyone looking at a spreadsheet.
Check access from the public road through to the proposed landing. Assess entrance width, sightlines, turning space, bridge limits, overhead services, road condition and whether loaded timber lorries can enter, turn and leave without causing damage or blocking the highway. A good landing on a poor access route is not a good landing.
Within the block, look at slope, bearing capacity, rut risk, watercourses, ditches, drains, rock, standing deadwood, boundary lines and public rights of way. Identify where machines can travel, where they cannot, and what will be needed to make the route workable. Mats, brash, temporary crossings, winch assistance or a different extraction system all have a cost.
The stand itself needs an honest assessment. Confirm average stem size, species, stocking, form, disease, windblow, lean and likely product split. A quoted volume may be based on an old inventory or a high-level assessment. If the site shows a significant gap between the stated volume and what is standing, raise it before pricing. The same applies where poor form or excessive defect will reduce sawlog recovery and leave more low-value material to handle.
Photographs, notes and a marked-up site map are useful evidence. They help you price properly, brief the crew and explain later why a particular allowance was included.
Build the production estimate from the ground up
Most bad tenders begin with an optimistic production figure. It is easy to divide stated volume by the output of a harvester on a good site and produce an attractive rate. It is also how a contractor ends up working long days for no return.
Estimate each part of the job separately: felling and processing, extraction, loading, road or track work, site protection, supervision, machine movements and completion works. Use genuine records from comparable sites wherever possible. Your own machine data, fuel use, repair history and operator output are more valuable than a generic benchmark.
Factor in the things that reduce productive hours. Moving between parcels, setting out exclusion zones, public interface, daily machine checks, refuelling, sorting multiple assortments, breakdowns, rain stoppages and lorry delays are all real. They may not appear on a production sheet, but they appear in the final margin.
The machinery choice should follow the terrain and crop, not the kit that happens to be available. A harvester and forwarder may be the right answer for a firm, accessible block. On steeper, wetter or more sensitive ground, a smaller machine, winch-assist system, skyline, tractor and winch, or a different sequence of operations may protect both the site and the margin. The cheapest-looking system is not always the lowest-cost system once damage, downtime and client dissatisfaction are counted.
Price the work, the risk and the cashflow
A tender rate needs to recover every cost involved in doing the contract, not just fuel and wages. Include machine ownership or finance, depreciation, repairs, maintenance, tyres or tracks, chains, lubricants, insurance, transport, labour, management time, compliance, accommodation where relevant and a sensible contingency.
Separate fixed costs from variable costs. Fixed costs continue whether the job runs well or not. Variable costs rise with hours, tonnes, distance and wear. This makes it easier to test the bid when the client changes the volume, extraction distance or programme.
Then decide how risk is dealt with. On a fixed-price contract, uncertainty around volume, ground conditions or timber recovery must be allowed for in the figure. On a measured-rate contract, a lower contingency may be justified, but only if measurement rules are clear and you are paid promptly for the work completed.
Cashflow deserves as much attention as margin. Check payment terms, retentions, invoicing requirements and whether you will be carrying wages, diesel, haulage or subcontractor costs for 30, 60 or 90 days. A contract can show a profit on paper and still put pressure on the business if the payment cycle is poor.
Do not price simply to keep machines busy. A quiet machine is expensive, but a loss-making contract can be worse. It ties up operators and equipment, increases wear and may prevent you taking better work when it arrives.
Write a tender the client can assess easily
A winning submission is not always the lowest. Woodland managers and timber buyers want confidence that the contractor understands the site, will meet the programme and will not leave them dealing with damaged roads, safety failures or a public complaint.
State clearly what your price includes, the payment basis, the expected programme, the machinery proposed and any assumptions. If you have allowed for a defined extraction distance, a certain volume, a specified number of landings or client-provided access, say so. Hidden assumptions create arguments later.
Explain your method in practical terms. Set out how you will establish the site, manage traffic and public access, protect watercourses and retained trees, deal with fuel, control mud on the road and leave the site at completion. Keep it specific to the block. Generic safety wording does little to show that you have seen the job.
Your tender should also demonstrate that the people and plant are ready. Include relevant insurance, competence records, risk assessment and method statement arrangements, machine details and any subcontractor roles requested by the client. Make sure dates, figures and company details match throughout. A strong bid can still fall down on an expired certificate or an incomplete form.
Tender woodland contracts with conditions that protect both sides
Where the risk cannot be priced with confidence, qualify it. This is not an excuse to make the tender vague. It is a way of being precise about what happens if conditions differ materially from those tendered.
Useful qualifications may cover unrecorded services, significant changes in volume, unsuitable ground conditions, abnormal contamination, restricted haulage access, prolonged weather stoppages or additional environmental requirements introduced after award. The client may accept them, reject them or ask for clarification, but they should not be surprised by them after the machines arrive.
Be careful not to load a tender with so many exclusions that it becomes impossible to compare or looks like you are unwilling to carry normal operational risk. The judgement is knowing what a competent site survey should have identified and what remains genuinely outside your control.
Review the number before it goes in
Before submission, have someone who knows the operation challenge the estimate. Ask where the production figure came from, whether the machine hours are realistic, how the worst section of ground has been allowed for and whether the rate still works if recovery is poorer than expected. A second set of eyes often finds a missing mobilisation cost, an unrealistic forwarding distance or a vague completion obligation.
If you are unsuccessful, ask for feedback where the client is willing to give it. You may learn that your price was out of line, but you may also find that programme certainty, environmental detail, equipment availability or presentation decided the result. That information improves the next tender more than blindly cutting your rate.
The best woodland contracts are usually won before the tender is typed: on the site walk, in the production calculation and in the discipline to price the work as it really is. Put a sound, explainable figure in front of the client, then make sure the operation on the ground is capable of proving you right.
Contact forestmachinemagazine@mail.com to get your products and services seen on the world’s largest professional forestry online news network.
#homeoflogging #writtenbyloggersforloggers #loggingallovertheworld
Written by loggers for loggers and dedicated to bringing you the latest forestry news